Case 2207070/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Audrey Ettel v West End Galleries Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2207070/2025
- Decision date
- 8 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Audrey Ettel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file an ET3 within the deadline and did not request an extension of time. Employment Judge Brown determined that a decision could properly be made without a hearing under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024, having considered the ET1 and attached materials.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's wages for work done between June and September 2025. The claimant was paid £12.82 per hour and worked 92 hours, totalling £1,179.44. The respondent was ordered to pay that sum, accounting to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 default judgment under the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024; respondent failed to file an ET3. | Upheld | — | £1,179 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,179
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.