Case 2207083/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Soko v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207083/2021
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Soko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr Soko's claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against Tesco Stores Limited were presented out of time.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim within time and that it had not been presented within a reasonable period thereafter. For disability discrimination, the tribunal found that it would not be just and equitable to extend time for presentation of the claim.
Accordingly, the claim was struck out because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was presented out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it within time and that it was not presented within a reasonable period thereafter, so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claim was presented out of time. The tribunal found it would not be just and equitable to extend time, so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.