Case 2207096/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Helm v SLB Capital Management Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207096/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Helm
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Norris, sitting alone by CVP at Central London on 16 February 2022, held that the Claimant’s claim against the First Respondent was well-founded and succeeded. The Tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay a gross sum of £27,376.31, made up of £18,871.75 for unlawful deduction from wages from 1 September to 13 October 2021 inclusive, £3,076.90 for one week's notice pay, £4,307.66 for seven days' accrued but untaken annual leave, and £1,120 for unpaid pension contributions from 1 August to 13 October 2021.
The claim against the Second Respondent was struck out. The Tribunal also ordered the First Respondent to reimburse the Claimant £2,062.50 in legal costs on the basis that the response stood no reasonable prospect of success. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages from 1 September to 13 October 2021 inclusive. | Upheld | — | £18,872 |
| Breach of contract | One week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,077 |
| Holiday pay | Seven days' accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £4,308 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid pension contributions from 1 August to 13 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,376
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.