Case 2207100/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Gamero Campos v Is You Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2207100/2021
- Decision date
- 27 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Gamero Campos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent before Employment Judge Khan at London Central (CVP) on 27 October 2025. The respondent, Is You Limited, accepted that it had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in respect of overtime and holiday pay, in the total net sum of £3,700.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent shall pay the claimant £3,700 within 28 days, and that as this represents a net payment the respondent shall also account to HMRC for any additional payment due in respect of tax and national insurance. The claimant, represented pro bono by Mr F Whitehead, then withdrew the unauthorised deductions complaint on the basis of the agreed payment.
The judgment does not set out contested findings of fact, apply any named legal tests, or identify lay panel members. It is a one-page consent disposal resolving the wages and holiday pay components by agreement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent. The respondent accepted unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of overtime and holiday pay totalling £3,700 net, payable within 28 days. The claimant then withdrew the unauthorised deductions complaint. Classified as settled because the matter was resolved by consent with an agreed payment, although the judgment also records a withdrawal. | Settled | — | £3,700 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was included within the agreed £3,700 net sum (alongside overtime) under the consent judgment; not separately quantified. The Layer 1 working_time hint is reflected here as a holiday pay component rather than a distinct working time claim, since the judgment frames it as an unauthorised deductions matter. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.