Case 2207122/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alimi in person (until about 11.45 am) v Mr Stefan Liberadzki Counsel — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207122/2021
- Decision date
- 23 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hogarth Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alimi in person (until about 11.45 am)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a claim for unlawful deduction from wages brought by Mr Olufemi Alimi against ENI International Resources Ltd. It found that the respondent had wrongly deducted £622.84 from the claimant’s salary, but that this amount had subsequently been repaid apart from a £50 PAYE deduction that had been paid to HMRC. The tribunal therefore treated the live issue as limited to the respondent’s failure to repay that £50.
The claim was struck out under rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success. The judgment records no monetary award, and no further remedy was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that £622.84 had been deducted from the claimant’s salary, but that sum had later been repaid subject to a £50 PAYE deduction paid to HMRC. The remaining issue was the respondent’s failure to repay the £50. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.