Case 2207137/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v BSS Associates Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207137/2021
- Decision date
- 25 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Wood Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence after deciding that the respondent's late reasons for non-attendance were unconvincing and that it was unlikely to attend on another occasion. The claimant's evidence was largely accepted where it was not challenged, and the tribunal found that he had been employed by the respondent from December 2004.
The tribunal found that the respondent refused to pay the claimant, told him to leave the office, and repeatedly called him a thief. It found that this amounted to dismissal without notice on alleged misconduct grounds, but that the respondent had not shown a genuine belief in misconduct, had not carried out a reasonable investigation, and had not followed any disciplinary or other process. In the alternative, the tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed by conduct breaching the implied term of trust and confidence.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been given written particulars of employment, had not been paid accrued holiday pay, had not been paid July 2021 wages, and had not received 12 weeks' statutory notice pay. The respondent's contractual claim was dismissed because no evidence was provided in support of it.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and orders compensation of £25,149.75. The remedy reasons contain internal arithmetic inconsistencies, including references to a basic award of £8,704, a total compensatory award of £23,970.83, and a later reference to a basic award of £4,080. | Upheld | — | £25,150 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 1 ERA 1996; four weeks' pay was awarded under section 38 Employment Act 2002 as part of the unfair dismissal compensation. | Upheld | — | £2,176 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have made unlawful deductions by failing to pay 1.9 weeks' accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,280 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unlawful deductions by failing to pay the claimant's July 2021 salary. | Upheld | — | £5,313 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent was found to have breached the claimant's contract by dismissing him without notice; 12 weeks' salary was awarded. | Upheld | — | £14,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47,142
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,704
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £23,971
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.207A TULRCA 1992
- ACAS Code
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- sections 1(1) and 1(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.