Mr C v Withers Ing Services Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2207180/2018
Decision date: 7 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Adkin MEMBERS
Panel members: Ms KA Church, Mr I McLaughlin

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C

Respondent

Withers Ing Services Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at London Central on 4 and 7 October 2019 before Employment Judge Adkin with lay members Ms KA Church and Mr I McLaughlin. The judgment records that the parties had agreed confidential terms of settlement in writing.

On that basis, the tribunal stated that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on the age discrimination or unfair dismissal allegations are set out in the judgment.

The tribunal made no order as to costs.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The judgment records that the parties agreed confidential terms of settlement in writing and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination is given.	Withdrawn	Age	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the parties agreed confidential terms of settlement in writing and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination is given.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.