Case 2207183/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss V. Olatunji v LEXefiscal LLP — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207183/2021
- Decision date
- 16 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss V. Olatunji
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss V. Olatunji worked for LEXefiscal LLP as an office administrator from 24 May 2021 to 11 November 2021 under a contract providing for basic salary of £26,000 and a gross bonus of £4,000 subject to mutually agreed targets. An unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out on 29 April 2021 because she did not have sufficient qualifying service.
At the hearing, the claimant withdrew the holiday pay claim after accepting that the respondent had already paid £950 in lieu of 9.5 accrued but untaken days of leave. The tribunal rejected the wrongful dismissal aspect of the breach of contract claim because the contract permitted termination on one month’s notice or payment in lieu, which the respondent provided.
The tribunal found that the respondent was nevertheless in breach of contract because the notice pay was not paid when due on 1 December 2021 and was only paid later. No damages were awarded for that breach, however, because the claimant did not prove financial loss attributable to the delay; the payments identified from her bank account were treated as pre-existing liabilities or voluntary payments rather than loss caused by the late payment.
The unlawful deduction from wages claim, based on non-payment of the £4,000 bonus, failed. The tribunal accepted that a bonus can be wages and that the contract created a legal entitlement in principle, but it found that the bonus depended on mutually agreed targets, no targets were discussed or set, and therefore no entitlement to the bonus arose during the employment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out on 29 April 2021 because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn after the claimant accepted the respondent had paid £950 in lieu of 9.5 accrued but untaken days of leave. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant was contractually entitled to one month's notice or pay in lieu, which the respondent provided; the wrongful dismissal aspect therefore failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent breached contract by paying notice pay late, after it was due on 1 December 2021, but no damages were awarded because no consequential financial loss was proved. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The bonus was wages in principle, but the tribunal found no mutually agreed targets had been discussed or set, so no entitlement to the £4,000 bonus arose and there was no unlawful deduction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27(1) ERA 1996
- Mouradian v Tradition Securities and Futures [2009] EWCA Civ 60
- Agarwal v Cardiff University and anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2084
- Farrell Matthews and Weir v Hansen 2005 ICR 509
- section 207A TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.