Case 2207204/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Adeniran v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207204/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Adeniran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited. The hearing took place remotely by video before Employment Judge Nicklin, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance by the respondent.
The tribunal dismissed the redundancy payment claim, finding that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment. It also dismissed the breach of contract claim for notice pay because it found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that claim. Written reasons were not included in the judgment record because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment and dismisses the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a breach of contract claim for notice pay and states that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.