Case 2207220/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Florence Ochieng v Staffing Professionals Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207220/2020
- Decision date
- 21 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Florence Ochieng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Florence Ochieng's case against Staffing Professionals Ltd was heard remotely at London Central on 21 May 2021 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The parties did not object to the remote hearing, which took place on Cloud Video Platform because a face-to-face hearing was not practicable and the tribunal considered that all issues could be determined remotely.
The written judgment records only that the Claimant's claim fails and is dismissed. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the extracted text contains no further findings, no liability reasoning, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records only that the Claimant's claim failed and was dismissed; it does not separate the reasons or any award by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records only that the Claimant's claim failed and was dismissed; it does not separate the reasons or any award by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.