Case 2207230/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Sharp v Global Support Services (UK) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207230/2021
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mr J Ballard, Mr M Ferry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Sharp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central, Employment Judge A M Snelson sitting with Mr J Ballard and Mr M Ferry determined Mr J Sharp's claims against Global Support Services (UK) Ltd after a hearing on 26-30 June 2023. By consent, the complaint of wrongful dismissal was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £3,250.
The tribunal found that Mr Sharp's direct sex discrimination complaint was not well-founded, as was his victimisation complaint. His unfair dismissal complaint under s103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was also not well-founded.
The tribunal upheld Mr Sharp's claim for compensation in respect of annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination and ordered payment of £3,519, which the judgment records was agreed as a figure and given as a gross figure. It also upheld the claim under ss10 and 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 for denial of the right to be accompanied, awarding £1,088 representing two weeks' capped pay. The monetary awards total £7,857.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | By consent. | Upheld | — | £3,250 |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination complaint found not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint found not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Whistleblowing | Unfair dismissal complaint under s103A ERA 1996 found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for outstanding annual leave on termination; sum was agreed and recorded as a gross figure. | Upheld | — | £3,519 |
| Other | Claim under Employment Relations Act 1999 ss10 and 11 for denial of the right to be accompanied; compensation represented two weeks' pay (capped). | Upheld | — | £1,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,857
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.