Case 2207241/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kearns v Trinity Brands UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207241/2021
- Decision date
- 24 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Kearns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, the claimant’s complaints in relation to unpaid holiday pay and notice pay succeeded by default.
The tribunal made a total award of £43,509.56 payable by the respondent to the claimant. That sum comprised £18,509.56 gross holiday pay and £25,000 net notice pay. The judgment records that the notice pay element was capped at £25,000 under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994, Regulation 10.
The hearing listed for 16 February 2022 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as gross holiday pay under Rule 21 after no response was presented. | Upheld | — | £18,510 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded as net notice pay and capped at £25,000 under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994, Regulation 10. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £43,510
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994, Regulation 10
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.