Case 2207292/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Justin Kee Son v Santi & Santi Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207292/2020
- Decision date
- 8 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Justin Kee Son
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing on 8 February 2021 before Employment Judge Nicklin, the claimant’s form was amended to add a claim for unlawful deduction of wages covering the period September 2020 to January 2021. The tribunal dismissed the claims for a redundancy payment and notice pay.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made a series of unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages during September 2020 to January 2021. It ordered Santi & Santi Limited to pay the claimant £8,666.65 in respect of gross unpaid wages, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance and any other deductions authorised by statute or the claimant’s contract of employment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the notice pay claim; it does not separately label the legal basis, but notice pay is the claim referred to in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unlawful deductions from wages for September 2020 to January 2021 and awarded gross unpaid wages, subject to deductions for tax, national insurance, and any other authorised deductions. | Upheld | — | £8,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,667
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.