Case 2207299/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Marchiori v Wimand Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207299/2021
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Marchiori
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Central London Employment Tribunal on 6 June 2022, Employment Judge Norris sat alone via CVP. The Claimant, Mr N Marchiori, appeared in person and the Respondent, Wimand Limited, was represented by its director, Mr E Fogli. The judgment records that the hearing was decided the same day and that reasons were given orally, so no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal allowed the Claimant's claims for failure to pay holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages. It also allowed the claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment does not separate the award between those successful heads of claim.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a total of £2,071.69 without deduction, expressed to be net of tax in the Claimant's hands. No other remedy components are recorded in the written decision provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim of failure to pay holiday pay succeeds. The award is not split between the successful claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeds. The award is not split between the successful claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Recorded as a failure to provide a statement of employment particulars contrary to section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that this claim succeeds, but the award is not apportioned. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,072
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.