Case 2207303/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207303/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
- Panel members
- Ms S Aslett, Ms J Holgate
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central by video on 13 and 14 September 2022 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting with tribunal members Ms S Aslett and Ms J Holgate. The judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The only substantive disposal in the extracted text is that all of the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed. The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning in the text supplied here.
The final page notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would be provided to the parties in due course after the respondent requested them at the end of the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category 'Public Interest Disclosure'; the extracted judgment text itself only states that all of the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category 'Sex Discrimination'; the extracted judgment text itself only states that all of the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.