Case 2207312/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207312/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the hearing took place at London Central by video on 31 July 2023 before Employment Judge E Burns. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by David Mitchell, counsel.
The tribunal stated that all of the claimant's complaints were struck out. It then recorded that the claim was dismissed. No reasons for the strike-out are set out in the extracted text, and no separate liability findings or remedy assessment are given.
The judgment also states that the decision applies only to case 2207312/2023 and not to claim 2206974/2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment does not identify the individual allegation beyond saying that all of the claimant's complaints were struck out. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not identify the individual allegation beyond saying that all of the claimant's complaints were struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment does not identify the individual allegation beyond saying that all of the claimant's complaints were struck out. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.