Case 2207313/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Grant-Taylor v Duck and Champagne Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207313/2023
- Decision date
- 5 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lambert Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Grant-Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss S Grant-Taylor's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was well-founded and succeeded. The hearing was before Employment Judge Lambert on 4 July 2023, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr Lyall.
The judgment records that Mr Lyall was available to agree the sums set out by the tribunal. The claimant was awarded £750 for non-payment of February 2023 wages, £2,174.79 for non-payment of March 2023 wages, and £1,827.22 for non-payment of variable pay based on contractually agreed remuneration linked to sales.
The total amount payable was £4,752.01. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages well-founded. The respondent's director, Mr Lyall, was available to agree the sums recorded in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,752 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,752
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.