Case 2207325/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Tomison of Counsel. For the v Respondent — 2024

Case reference: 2207325/2021
Decision date: 9 May 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
Panel members: M Ferry, J Marshall

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr P Tomison of Counsel. For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability had been withdrawn and dismissed them under Rule 52. It found that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period by reason of stress, anxiety, and depression, and dismissed the reasonable adjustments complaint.

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded and stated that there was a zero percent chance that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. It also upheld specified victimisation complaints concerning detriments 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g(i), 16g(ii), and 16j, while dismissing the remaining victimisation complaints.

The judgment states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons had been requested. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed to be decided at a remedies hearing on 1 and 3 July 2024 if not agreed earlier.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The complaints of direct disability discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 and discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed pursuant to Rule 52.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant period by reason of stress, anxiety, and depression, and that the respondent was not in breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments under s.21 Equality Act 2010.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Victimisation	The tribunal upheld victimisation complaints for detriments 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g(i), 16g(ii), and 16j. The remaining victimisation complaints were dismissed.	Upheld	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded and stated there was a zero percent chance that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

6 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.