Case 2207336/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Walker, Counsel v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207336/2020
- Decision date
- 4 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr T Walker, Counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing the Respondent’s concession, the Claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the net sum of £359.10, representing the difference between the salary received and the correct pay rate for the period April to August 2020.
The Claimant’s breach of contract claim, which concerned enhanced redundancy pay, was also found to be well founded and succeeded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £20,625.30 without deduction. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Respondent conceded the claim. The award was the net difference between salary received and the correct pay rate for April to August 2020. | Upheld | — | £359 |
| Breach of contract | The claim concerned enhanced redundancy pay. The tribunal ordered payment without deduction. | Upheld | — | £20,625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,984
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.