Case 2207340/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Senol Asaf v London Borough of Islington — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207340/2022
- Decision date
- 7 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr Ian Allwright, Mr Terry Cook
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Senol Asaf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded judgment after a hearing at London Central before Employment Judge Gidney, sitting with Mr Ian Allwright and Mr Terry Cook. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment dismissed the claim of automatic unfair dismissal for making a public interest disclosure, the ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and the claim of detriments for making protected disclosures. It also dismissed the claims of direct age discrimination and unlawful deduction of pay.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The written judgment therefore records the outcomes but does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning on the claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim of automatic unfair dismissal for making a public interest disclosure pursuant to s103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim of ordinary unfair dismissal pursuant to s98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim of detriments for making protected disclosures pursuant to s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Claim of direct age discrimination pursuant to s5 and s13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim of unlawful deduction of pay pursuant to s13 Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- s5 Equality Act 2010
- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.