Case 2207375/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For v Mr L Welsh (HR Consultant) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207375/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
- Panel members
- L Moreton, P de Chaumont-Rambert
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent's response was struck out. The tribunal recorded the pregnancy and maternity discrimination claim as dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal at the preliminary hearing on 21 July 2021. It also dismissed the direct race discrimination claim for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time under s.123(1)(a) EqA 2010 and the tribunal did not consider it just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b) EqA 2010. The direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed.
The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to determine the reasonable adjustments complaint under s.123(1)(b) EqA 2010, but found that at all relevant times the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of s.6 EqA 2010. On that basis, the claim under ss.20 and 21 EqA 2010 failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and awarded compensation of £14,147. The award section records a basic award of £1,614, but that amount was fully offset by SRP received so the total basic award was nil. The compensatory award was calculated by reference to lost salary and pension benefits for 5.8 months from the effective date of termination on 6 August 2020, less notice pay received and £500 for loss of statutory rights; the tribunal recorded a nil Polkey reduction. For recoupment purposes, the prescribed element was £13,647, the prescribed period ran from 6 August 2020 to 23 June 2022, and the excess over the prescribed element was £500.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal at the preliminary hearing on 21 July 2021. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Race discrimination | Presented out of time under s.123(1)(a) EqA 2010; the tribunal refused to extend time as just and equitable under s.123(1)(b) EqA 2010 and dismissed the claim for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal accepted jurisdiction under s.123(1)(b) EqA 2010 but found the claimant did not have a disability within s.6 EqA 2010, so the reasonable adjustments complaint under ss.20 and 21 EqA 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded £14,147 in total compensation. The basic award of £1,614 was offset by SRP received, leaving a total basic award of nil; the compensatory award was £14,147 and the Polkey reduction was nil. | Upheld | — | £14,147 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,147
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,614
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £14,147
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.18 EqA 2010
- s.123(1)(a) EqA 2010
- s.123(1)(b) EqA 2010
- s.13 EqA 2010
- ss.20, 21 EqA 2010
- s.6 EqA 2010
- Polkey reduction
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.