Case 2207379/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M Ibeziako v Oakwood 24 Limited and 2 others — 2023

Case reference: 2207379/2022
Decision date: 23 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ayre

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Mr M Ibeziako

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At this preliminary hearing, Mr M Ibeziako pursued allegations against Ms S Rostron Heard of victimisation and direct race discrimination. The tribunal recorded that he said she had blocked him from being used as a worker at East Riding Community Hospital, refused to provide documents in response to a subject access request, refused to hear his complaint, and terminated the use of the First Respondent so as to prevent him being sent to work there. He also alleged that she had dealt with his complaint non-transparently because of race.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Victimisation	Claim against the Third Respondent; the tribunal found she had no knowledge of the protected act relied on and no involvement in the alleged acts.	Struck out	—	—
Race discrimination	Direct race discrimination allegation against the Third Respondent; the tribunal found she had no knowledge of the complaint or investigation and no involvement in the matters complained of.	Struck out	Race	—

Legal tests applied

6 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.