Case 2207464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Noie-Pirzaman v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207464/2020
- Decision date
- 17 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Noie-Pirzaman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that claim number 2201524/2021 was dismissed on its withdrawal. It also substituted the Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy as a party on the tribunal's own initiative and extended time for that respondent to present its response dated 13 May 2021.
The tribunal then dismissed the claimant's claim as not well founded. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time. No monetary remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant's claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The published listing category is breach of contract, but the written judgment does not set out the pleaded cause of action or reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment also records that claim number 2201524/2021 was dismissed on withdrawal, but it does not identify the claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.