Case 2207468/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Pavlou v AND Global Village Travel Centre Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207468/2021
- Decision date
- 14 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Pavlou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim had been presented. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, Employment Judge Coen entered judgment in the claimant's favour and recorded that the claimant's claims succeed.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay gross statutory redundancy pay of £8,976. It also ordered gross sums of £8,360.31 for twelve weeks' contractual notice pay and £5,685 for 40.8 days' holiday pay accrued but not taken on termination of employment.
The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision. The total ordered by the tribunal was £23,021.31 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment ordered gross statutory redundancy pay in this amount. | Upheld | — | £8,976 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment ordered gross contractual notice pay of £8,360.31 and gross holiday pay of £5,685 following termination, but did not allocate a single combined figure to this claim in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,021
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.