Case 2207495/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207495/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented by the respondent. The tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, and held that the claimant's claims succeeded following termination of employment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay statutory redundancy pay, contractual notice pay, holiday pay accrued but not taken on termination, and several sums for unpaid wages and unpaid furlough payments. Reasons had been given orally at the hearing, with written reasons only to be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded as statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £16,320 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as twelve weeks' contractual notice pay. | Upheld | — | £7,380 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 86 days' holiday accrued but not taken on termination. | Upheld | — | £10,584 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Sum of awards for unpaid October 2021 wages, unpaid August and September 2021 wages, unpaid furlough payments in August and September 2021, and unpaid wages for 53 days' work undertaken during 2021. | Upheld | — | £10,791 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £45,075
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.