Case 2207500/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Erskine v Anglo-Europe Minerals Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207500/2021
- Decision date
- 23 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bunting Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Erskine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 23 September 2022 before Employment Judge Bunting at London Central, the parties agreed terms of settlement. The written judgment records that, by consent, the first and second claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
Under the settlement terms, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £30,000 by 4pm on 30 September 2022, a further £10,000 by 4pm on 24 October 2022, and a final £10,000 by 4pm on 7 November 2022, less any tax and employee National Insurance Contributions due. The tribunal made no order as to costs.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment does not contain merits findings on the underlying unlawful deduction from wages or working time claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The first claim was dismissed on withdrawal by consent after settlement terms were agreed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The second claim was dismissed on withdrawal by consent after settlement terms were agreed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.