Case 2207503/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Solomon v Movebubble Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207503/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Solomon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Following a request for reconsideration by the claimant, REJ Wade determined that the remaining claims could properly be decided without a hearing on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant's wages, including pension contributions. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,087.43 and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due.
The judgment does not set out any separate findings on additional claims, nor does it identify any compensatory, basic award, or interest element. The only monetary figure recorded in the judgment is the gross sum awarded for unpaid wages and related pension contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The rule 21 judgment states that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay the claimant's wages, including pension contributions, and orders payment of the gross sum of £2,087.43. No separate breakdown is given for any other claim. | Upheld | — | £2,087 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,087
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.