Case 2207511/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Budds v Huptown Incorporated Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207511/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Appearances For
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Budds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Budds worked as London Operational Manager for Huptown Incorporated Ltd from 1 August 2021 on £40,000 gross per year. Before the merits decision, the tribunal refused his application to amend the claim to add loss of employer pension contributions, loss of potential stock-award profit, mental and emotional distress, and reputational-damage claims. It applied Selkent Bus Company Ltd v Moore and G Vaughan v Modality Partnership, finding that the new claims had not been raised earlier, would delay the hearing and increase expense for the respondent, and that the tribunal had no jurisdiction over the distress and reputational-damage heads of loss.
The unfair dismissal claim failed because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and therefore did not satisfy the qualifying period in s.108(1) ERA 1996. On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he had told the respondent about his pre-booked August holiday and had been asked to remain available while away. It found the respondent's hourly-rate calculation on the August payslip unexplained and preferred the claimant's evidence over the respondent's account of attendance in November, including because no attendance records were produced. It held that wages were underpaid for August, September, October and November 2021, producing a total arrears award of £2,249.62 gross.
On holiday pay and notice, the tribunal held that the signed offer letter dated 21 July 2021, rather than the staff handbook, governed the employment terms. That letter provided 40 days' holiday plus bank holidays and 30 days' written notice. Because the claimant had taken no paid holiday, the tribunal awarded £2,538.46 gross for accrued but untaken leave, calculated by reference to the notional end date of 29 December 2021 if proper notice had been given. It also awarded £3,333.33 gross for breach of contract because the respondent did not give the contractual 30 days' written notice.
The tribunal accepted that a £1,320 tax rebate appeared on the November 2021 payslip and HMRC documentation but was not actually paid. It said it had no jurisdiction to order the respondent to rectify the tax and National Insurance position, and indicated that the claimant may need to take that issue up with HMRC. The total gross award was £8,121.41.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant had been employed from 1 August 2021 to 30 November 2021, so he did not meet the two-year qualifying period in s.108(1) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld for underpaid wages between August and November 2021. The tribunal found the respondent's payslip calculations unexplained, preferred the claimant's evidence on August holiday availability and November attendance, and awarded the shortfall for those months in total. | Upheld | — | £2,250 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld for accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. The tribunal held the signed offer letter of 21 July 2021, not the staff handbook, governed and entitled the claimant to 40 days' leave plus bank holidays. | Upheld | — | £2,538 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld for failure to give the contractual 30 days' written notice set out in the offer letter. The respondent's 29 November 2021 letter gave notice ending employment on 30 November 2021, so one month's pay was awarded. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Other | The tribunal accepted that a £1,320 tax rebate was shown on the November 2021 payslip and HMRC documentation but found it had not been paid. It said it had no jurisdiction to order rectification of the tax/NIC issue and indicated the claimant may need to raise it with HMRC. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,121
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- Selkent Bus Company Ltd v Moore
- G Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- s.108(1) ERA 1996
- s.13(1) ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.221-224 ERA 1996
- s.86(1)(a) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.