Case 2207540/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Vitale v Enoteca (UK) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207540/2020
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wisby
- Venue
- London Central via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Vitale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Wisby sat alone on 6 January 2022. The Tribunal declared that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages in two respects: £1,384.62 gross for notice pay and £1,507.42 gross for holiday pay. It ordered the Respondent to pay those sums to the Claimant.
The Tribunal also ordered the Respondent to pay £229.38 in respect of the statutory redundancy payment to which the Claimant was entitled. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal declared unauthorised deductions from wages of £1,384.62 gross in respect of notice pay and £1,507.42 gross in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,892 |
| Redundancy | The Tribunal ordered payment of the statutory redundancy payment the Claimant was entitled to. | Upheld | — | £229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,121
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.