Case 2207544/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Antoniou and others set out in the attached Schedule v Intu Management Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207544/2020
- Decision date
- 26 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Antoniou and others set out in the attached Schedule
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a judgment by consent under Rule 64 after reading the parties' joint application. It recorded that, in relation to the claimants named in the attached schedule, the respondent failed to adequately comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and that the claims for a protective award under section 189 of that Act succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the sums listed in the schedule to the named claimants in respect of a protected period of 56 days beginning on 29 June 2020, the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaints related took effect. The individual awards ranged from £3,680.62 to £4,304.00, and the total of the scheduled awards was £92,768.01.
The judgment also stated that, subject to the normal categories of preferential debts in Schedule 6 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any amounts payable by the respondent rather than the Secretary of State would be treated as an unsecured claim against the respondent's estate and would rank for dividend with ordinary unsecured creditors under the Insolvency Act 1986 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016. The tribunal made no order as to costs, with each party bearing its own costs.
Claims and outcomes
22 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Ms Sienna Lewis-Borrett; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £3,681 |
| Other | Ms Anna Antoniou; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
| Other | Mr Shane Robert Bond; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
| Other | Mr Oleksandr Smirnov; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
| Other | Ms Amanda Luxford; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
| Other | Ms Della Andrews; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
| Other | Ms Carol Levy; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
| Other | Ms Jennifer Sandars; protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £92,768
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.