Case 2207552/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Northern Fides Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207552/2021
- Decision date
- 10 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Stout RULE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal therefore considered the ET1 and decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant's statutory redundancy payment when making him redundant. It ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £1,088 and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due.
The listed hearing on 18 March 2022 was vacated as a result of the rule 21 determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal determined the claim without a hearing and found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant's statutory redundancy payment on making him redundant. | Upheld | — | £1,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,088
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.