Case 2207566/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Carlson v Alphadean Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207566/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Central London via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Carlson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Moxon on 25 November 2022, amended the respondent’s name by consent to Alphadean Limited. It then found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages by failing to pay wages owed for July 2022 and August 2022, totalling £4,244.31 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination, in the sum of £2,005.38 gross. The judgment ordered payment of the total gross sum of £6,249.69 within 14 days of the written judgment. No written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for unpaid wages of £3,552 gross for July 2022 and £692.31 gross for August 2022. | Upheld | — | £4,244 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £2,005 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.