Case 2207589/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Beatrice Auty v Tommy Tucker Pubs Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207589/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Beatrice Auty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3. Employment Judge Goodman considered the ET1 and correspondence from the claimant and issued a Rule 21 judgment without a hearing. The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages of £1,670.95 and holiday pay of £204.70.
The tribunal also ordered payment of notice pay of £292.59. It directed the respondent to pay a total of £2,168.24 and to account to HMRC for any tax and NI due on that sum. The hearing listed for 9 January 2023 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages in the sum of £1,670.95. | Upheld | — | £1,671 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay in the sum of £204.70. | Upheld | — | £205 |
| Other | The tribunal ordered payment of notice pay in the sum of £292.59; the judgment does not identify a more specific legal label for that head. | Upheld | — | £293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,168
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.