Case 2207615/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207615/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented by Global Village Travel Centre Limited. Employment Judge Coen, sitting alone, gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims succeeded following termination of his employment. The respondent was ordered to pay gross sums for statutory redundancy pay, eleven weeks' statutory notice pay, and thirteen days' accrued but untaken holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded the gross sum of £7,072 in respect of statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £7,072 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded the gross sum of £8,639.23 in respect of eleven weeks' statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £8,639 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded the gross sum of £2,041.91 in respect of thirteen days' holiday accrued but not taken on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,042 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,753
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.