Case 2207624/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Mullings v Ealing Law Centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207624/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Grewal Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Mullings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr E Mullings presented a race discrimination claim against Ealing Law Centre on 5 October 2022. At the preliminary hearing on 18 May 2023, the tribunal first dealt with a July 2022 email from a Barnet Citizens Advice Bureau solicitor that had been attached to the claim form. The tribunal held that the claimant had selectively disclosed part of the legal advice to support his case and that fairness required disclosure of the remainder, so legal advice privilege was waived in full.
On the jurisdiction issue, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the race discrimination claim because the claimant's volunteering relationship with the respondent was not covered by section 83(2) of the Equality Act 2010 or by sections 55 to 56 of that Act. It relied on the authorities concerning volunteers at Citizens Advice Bureaux, including Melhuish v Redbridge CAB and X v Mid-Sussex CAB, and concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of establishing the necessary contractual or vocational training relationship.
The respondent applied for costs of £6,000 inclusive of VAT. The tribunal found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and that the claimant had acted unreasonably in bringing and continuing it after receiving detailed legal advice warning of the jurisdiction difficulties and the risk of costs. It accepted that his means were limited but was not satisfied that they were as limited as he presented, and ordered him to pay £1,000 toward the respondent's costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Preliminary jurisdiction decision only. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the race discrimination complaint because the claimant's volunteering relationship with Ealing Law Centre was not covered by section 83(2) or sections 55 to 56 of the Equality Act 2010; no merits finding was made. | Other | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- legal advice privilege waiver
- Paragon Finance Ltd v Freshfields partial waiver principle
- Brennan v Sunderland City Council substance and circumstances test
- Rule 76(1) Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- Rule 84 Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- objective no reasonable prospect of success / unreasonable conduct
- Radia v Jefferies International Ltd approach to rule 76
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.