Case 2207625/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Duodu v Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207625/2020
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
- Panel members
- Dr V Weerasinghe, Ms B Makins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Duodu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Duodu, brought complaints of sex discrimination, race discrimination, equal pay, victimisation and unlawful deduction from wages against the Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth. The judgment records that all of those complaints failed and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out detailed findings or any separate remedy analysis, and no monetary award was made. The case was heard remotely by CVP on 17 to 20 January 2022 before Employment Judge Davidson sitting with Dr V Weerasinghe and Ms B Makins.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Equal pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.