Case 2207633/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Nugent, Lay Representative For the v Ms L Brennan, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207633/2021
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Nugent, Lay Representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 5 April 2022 at London Central, Employment Judge B Beyzade entered judgment by consent of the parties in case 2207633/2021. The order required the respondents, B Barlett, CP Markes and CA Dunnington-Jefferson t/a Marldon (a partnership), to pay Mr W Webb by 4pm on 3 May 2022 £288 gross in respect of holiday pay, £720 gross in respect of notice pay, and £720 net in respect of statutory redundancy pay.
The judgment records no substantive liability findings because it was made by consent. It also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered by consent of the parties; ordered as compensation for holiday pay, stated as gross. | Settled | — | £288 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment entered by consent of the parties; ordered as compensation for notice pay, stated as gross. | Settled | — | £720 |
| Redundancy | Judgment entered by consent of the parties; ordered as statutory redundancy pay, stated as net. | Settled | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,728
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.