Case 2207637/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Dhir v Devonshire Development Limited Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207637/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Dhir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record relates to a remote hearing by Cloud Video Platform on 25 January 2023 before Employment Judge Davidson. The only substantive finding recorded is that Ms A Dhir was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time.
The document does not record any liability decision on the underlying discrimination or unfair dismissal claims, and it does not record any monetary award. On the face of this record, the tribunal's adjudicated finding extracted here is the disability-status determination only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states only that the tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. No merits outcome or remedy is recorded in this document. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.