Case 2207657/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M. Nwosu v Learning Disabilities Network London Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207657/2021
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M. Nwosu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central by video on 12 October 2022 before Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston. The claimant, Ms M. Nwosu, appeared in person and the respondent, Learning Disabilities Network London Ltd, was represented by counsel. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The Tribunal decided that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. Its finding was that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the normal time limit, but the claim was not presented within that time limit. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim because, although it was satisfied it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the normal time limit, it was not in fact presented within that limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.