Case 2207673/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Liliya Bashova v Sovrn UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207673/2020
- Decision date
- 30 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B. McKenna Date
- Venue
- London Central remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Liliya Bashova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge B. McKenna at London Central by CVP on 30 November 2021 in case 2207673/2020. The judgment was issued as a separate record from the main merits case and states that the hearing was in private. It does not determine the substantive employment claims pleaded in the case.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application to admit the fact and content of a "protected conversation" said to have taken place on 8 July 2020, together with documents evidencing subsequent negotiations, under s.111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that those references are not admissible in evidence at the full merits hearing and are to be removed from the pleadings, evidence, and Tribunal file.
The tribunal also held that communications between the claimant and the ACAS conciliation officer in the performance of their functions are not admissible in evidence at the full merits hearing by operation of s.18(7) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, and directed that references to those communications be removed from the pleadings, evidence, and Tribunal file. Finally, the respondent was directed to provide an appropriately redacted copy of the Tribunal bundle, including redacted pleadings, to the Tribunal and the claimant by no later than 7 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment is a preliminary hearing only. It decided the admissibility of a protected conversation under s.111A ERA 1996 and ACAS conciliation communications, not the substantive claims. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.18(7) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.