in person For the v Mr C Price — 2022

Case reference: 2207711/2020
Decision date: 10 February 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Siddall Representation

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

in person For the

Respondent

Mr C Price

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Siddall, sitting by video at London Central on 10 February 2022, found that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and did not succeed. The judgment records no monetary award for that claim.

The tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend the claim to include a statutory redundancy payment under section 148 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but the claim failed because section 150(3) of that Act was not complied with. The judgment also records that all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and did not succeed.	Dismissed	—	—
Redundancy	The claimant's application to amend to add a statutory redundancy payment claim under section 148 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was granted, but the claim failed because section 150(3) was not complied with.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	All other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.