Case 2207822/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Sole, counsel For the v Mr S Cheetham — 2019
- Case reference
- 2207822/2017
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hodgson
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr M Simon, Ms G Gillman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Sole, counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. It records that the hearing took place at London Central on 11 November 2019 before Employment Judge Hodgson, with Mr M Simon and Ms G Gillman sitting as lay members.
The judgment then states: "The unanimous judgment of the tribunal is that all claims are dismissed on withdrawal." On the face of the extracted text, no substantive liability findings are set out, and no remedy is recorded. The disposition is therefore that the proceedings ended by withdrawal and the claims were dismissed accordingly.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not specify the pleaded allegations beyond recording that all claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The case listing identified the matter as disability discrimination, so this is the most likely classification. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.