Case 2207923/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person v H Thomas (Director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207923/2022
- Decision date
- 6 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central by CVP on 4 April 2023 before Tribunal Judge McGrade, dealt with a single wage claim brought by Ms Jodie McHugh against Empire Group Recruitment Limited. The written judgment records that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms McHugh the gross sum of £1,282.70 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted and directed that appropriate PAYE deductions be made on that sum. No further breakdown of the award is given in the written judgment.
The notes state that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extract therefore records the outcome and remedy only, without a written explanation of the tribunal's reasoning beyond the finding of unlawful deduction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,282.70, subject to appropriate PAYE deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,283 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,283
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.