Case 2207933/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2207933/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim on 18-19 April 2023 at London Central Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Webster. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Tomison of counsel.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal stated that the claim was not upheld. No written reasons are included in the judgment because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The record notes that written reasons would only be provided if a written request was received from either party within 14 days of the sending of the decision record. No remedy or award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal was not upheld. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the sending of the record of decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.