Case 2207977/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Mukasa v Neota Logic Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207977/2022
- Decision date
- 28 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Mukasa
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in London Central on 28 February 2023, Employment Judge Joffe considered the claimant's race discrimination complaints against Neota Logic Limited and Mr J Liu. The first claim concerned the second respondent's not replying to the claimant's email of 28 July 2022. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction under the Equality Act 2010 to hear that claim, and it was dismissed.
The claimant's three remaining direct race discrimination claims were found to have been presented outside the time limits in section 123 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that it was not just and equitable to extend time for those claims to be heard, so they were dismissed.
In the alternative, the tribunal held that all of the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospects of success and would be struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant alleged race discrimination arising from the second respondent not replying to his email of 28 July 2022. The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction under the Equality Act 2010 to hear that claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | One of the claimant's remaining direct race discrimination claims. The tribunal held it was not presented within the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | One of the claimant's remaining direct race discrimination claims. The tribunal held it was not presented within the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | One of the claimant's remaining direct race discrimination claims. The tribunal held it was not presented within the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- not just and equitable to extend time
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.