Case 2208106/2022 · Employment Tribunal
M Phatey v Harrods Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208106/2022
- Decision date
- 7 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deol Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Phatey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim and unpaid holiday pay claim were not well founded and dismissed those claims.
The judgment also records that the remainder of the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No written reasons were provided in the judgment record, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to this as an 'unpaid holiday pay' claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Included as part of the 'remainder of the Claimant's claims' dismissed on withdrawal; the judgment does not identify each withdrawn claim individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included as part of the 'remainder of the Claimant's claims' dismissed on withdrawal; the judgment does not identify each withdrawn claim individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.