Case 2208119/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adrian Murray v Huddletons Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208119/2022
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Adrian Murray
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 18 July 2023, before Employment Judge Gidney at London Central and by CVP, the tribunal dealt with the proceedings on a strike-out basis. It struck out the claim against the 2nd Respondent because it was not being actively pursued, relying on Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal also struck out the Claimant's race discrimination claim and sexual orientation discrimination claim on the same basis, again under Rule 37(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue the claims. No substantive liability findings or compensation findings were made in this judgment.
The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written judgment being sent to the parties. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim against the 2nd Respondent struck out because it was not being actively pursued, pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claim struck out because it was not being actively pursued, pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Sexual orientation discrimination claim struck out because it was not being actively pursued, pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.