Case 2208264/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Powlesland (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208264/2022
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Powlesland (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe remedy hearing concerned the consequences of an earlier order for reinstatement in favour of Ms S Daud against London North Eastern Railway Limited. The tribunal said the outstanding issues were the calculation of salary, benefits and pension contributions, and whether a reinstatement date could be agreed. The respondent said it did not agree with the reinstatement order and might challenge it, but it supplied salary, benefit and pension figures. The claimant did not provide alternative figures or sums.
The tribunal ordered reinstatement on or before 15 September 2023, noting that the date previously suggested by the respondent had passed. It used a dismissal date of 19 July 2022 and a reinstatement date of 15 September 2023, giving 424 days. On the figures provided, it accepted gross salary at dismissal of £28,510, attendance allowance of £4,506, London allowance of £3,348 and travel pass/rail leisure card benefits of £4,000, producing gross salary and benefits of £40,364 and a daily rate of £110.59.
Using that daily rate, the tribunal calculated back pay and benefits at £46,890.16, to be subject to deduction of tax and national insurance as though the claimant had remained in employment during the period. It also calculated pension contributions using figures provided by the pension fund on 17 July 2023, resulting in an annual contribution figure of £3,447.25 and a prorated amount of £4,004.48 for the 424-day period. The total monetary sum ordered was £50,894.64.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy judgment following an order for reinstatement. The monetary figure is the back pay, benefits and pension contributions ordered under s.114 ERA 1996; no separate basic or compensatory award is specified in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £50,895 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50,895
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.114
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.