Case 2208269/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208269/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Representations
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Adkin heard the case at London Central Employment Tribunal on 18 and 19 April 2023, partly by CVP. The claimant, Mr L Sidhu, brought an unfair dismissal claim under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and a claim for breach of contract for notice pay against Booking.com Limited.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. On the breach of contract notice pay claim, the judgment records that there would be no damages. No monetary award is set out in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that there will be no damages in the claim for breach of contract for notice pay, but it does not expressly use the word dismissed. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 94 & 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.