Case 2208513/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Arloid Automation Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208513/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge E Burns considered the ET1 and decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant's wages. The amount identified as outstanding wages for Chiwe Wuche was £3,479.30.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,479.30 gross, subject to deductions for any tax and national insurance for which the respondent should account to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not file an ET3. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay outstanding wages of £3,479.30 gross and ordered payment of that sum subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,479 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,479
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.